Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 4, 2010

Employees Performance Tips

Seven Stupid Things EMPLOYEES

Do To

Screw Up Performance Appraisal

Managers, feel free to share this with employees, and employees,

feel free to share this with managers and/or colleagues.

Please ensure proper credit is given and that the work911.com

website address is included.

Generally, when performance appraisal goes awry, the primary

cause has little to do with employees. For the most part, employees

take their cues from management and human resources.

However, when individual employees perceive the process in

negative ways, they can create or damage even the best of

appraisal processes.

Stupid Thing #1: Focusing On The Appraisal Forms

Performance appraisal isn't about the forms (although, often

managers and HR treat it as such). The ultimate purpose of

performance appraisal is to allow employees and managers

to improve continuously and to remove barriers to job success.

In other words, to make everyone better. Forms don't make

people better, and are simply a way or recording basic information

for later reference. If the focus is getting the forms "done",

without thought and effort, the whole process becomes at best

a waste of time, and at worst, insulting.

Stupid Thing #2: Not Preparing Beforehand

Preparing for performance appraisal helps the employee focus

on the key issue - performance improvement, and to examine his

or her performance in a more objective way

(see defensiveness below). Unfortunately, many employees walk

into the appraisal meeting not having thought about the review

period, and so are unprepared to present their points of view.

Being unprepared means being a reactive participant, or being

a passive participant. Neither are going to help manager or

employee. Employees can prepare by reviewing their work

beforehand, identifying any barriers they faced in doing their

jobs, and refamiliarizing themselves with their job descriptions,

job responsibilities, and any job performance expectations set

with the manager.

Stupid Thing #3: Defensiveness

We tend to take our jobs seriously and personally, making it more

difficult to hear others' comments about our work, particularly

when they are critical. Even constructive criticism is often hard

to hear. If employees enter into the discussion with an attitude

of "defending", then it's almost impossible to create the dialog

necessary for performance improvement. That doesn't mean

employees can't present their own opinions and perceptions,

but it does mean that they should be presented in a calm,

factual manner, rather than a defensive, emotional way. Of course,

if managers are inept in the appraisal process, it makes it very

difficult to avoid this defensiveness.

Stupid Thing #4: Not Communicating During The Year

Employees need to know how they are doing all year round,

not just at appraisal time. Generally it is primarily management's

responsibility to ensure that there are no surprises at appraisal

time. Often managers discuss both positives and negatives of

employee performance throughout the year, but this is unfortunately,

not a universal practice. It's in the employees interests to open up

discussion about performance during the year, even if the manager

does not initiate it. The sooner employees know where they are at,

and what they need to change (or keep doing), the sooner problems

can be fixed. In fact many problems can be prevented if they are

caught early enough. Even if managers aren't creating that

communication,

employees can and should. It's a shared responsibility.

Stupid Thing #5: Not Clarifying Enough

Life would be much easier if managers were perfect, but they aren't.

Some communicate and explain well. Some don't. Some are

aggravating and some not. At times employees won't be clear about

their managers' reasoning or comments, or what a manager is

suggesting. That could be because the manager isn't clear him/herself,

or simply isn't good at explaining. However, unless employees clarify

when they aren't sure about the reasoning or explanations, they

won't know what they need to do to improve their future job

performance. It's important to leave the appraisal meeting having

a good understanding of what's been said. If that's not possible

clarification can occur after the meeting, or down the road, if that's

more appropriate.

Stupid Thing #6: Allowing One-Sidedness

Performance appraisals work best when both participants are active,

and expressing their positions and ideas. Some employees are

uncomfortable doing that, and while managers should be creating

a climate where employees are comfortable, some managers aren't

good at it. Performance appraisal time is an excellent time for

employees to make suggestions about things that could be changed

to improve performance, about how to remove barriers to job success,

and ways to increase productivity. Remember also that managers

can't read minds. The better managers will work with employees to

help them do their jobs more effectively, but they can't know how

they can help unless employees provide them with good, factual

information, or, even better, concrete ideas.

Dollar Dreams - Earn Money

Stupid Thing #7: Focusing On Appraisal As A Way Of

Getting More Money

Unfortunately, many organizations tie employee pay to appraisal

results, which puts employee and manager on opposite sides.

Employees in such systems tend to focus too much on the money

component, although that focus is certainly understandable. It's

also understandable when employees in such systems become

hesitant to reveal shortcomings or mistakes. But it's still dumb.

If employees main purpose is to squeeze as much of an increase

out of the company, and the managers try to keep increases as

small as possible, it becomes totally impossible to focus on what

ultimately matters over the long term, which is continuous

performance improvement and success for everyone.

Pay IS important, but it is not the only issue related to the appraisal

focus. If employees enter into the process willing to defend their

own positions in factual and fair ways, and to work with managers,

the process can become much more pleasant. If not, it can become

a war.

Conclusion:

The major responsibilities for setting performance appraisal tone

and climate rest with managers and the human resources department.

However, even when managers and human resources do their jobs

well, employees who come at the process with a negative or defensive

approach are not likely to gain from the process or to prosper over the

long term. The constant key is for employees to participate actively and

assertively, but to keep a problem-solving mindset, and keep focused

on how things can be improved in the future. No matter who initiates it,

performance appraisal is about positive open communication between

employee and manager.

No comments:

Post a Comment